Facing The External Editor–Or How to Make a Writer Cry Like a Wet Kitten

by Christina Lay

Having recently* spent four ten-hour days glued to my chair, editing a manuscript I had already rewritten and proofread to within an inch of its life before submitting to my publisher, I thought I’d take this opportunity to share my personal experience with facing The External Editor; the editor you’re not allowed to lock in a closet and ignore.  With luck you might find it helpful, maybe in that “but for the grace of God go I” sort of way.

 There once was a time long, long ago when I felt pretty sure on my feet regarding this whole craft of writing thing.  After all, my friends loved my stories  and I sold stuff, so obviously editors thought I was pretty great too.

Then I made my first book sale to a small but professional publisher.  I awaited my first round of editing with confident excitement.  I knew my punctuation skills were lacking somewhat, but I’d been writing for forty years, selling short stories for twenty and I figured the manuscript would only need a light going over. I’d revised and edited it so carefully before submitting it, after all.  I’d done my best and it was pretty darn good.

Pregnant pause.

A year and two projects later, not much has changed.  Third book, new editor, same writer. When I open the file and see that there are 2,234 insertions, deletions, formatting changes and comments to deal with, I am still a bit taken aback.  This editor must be insane, I think.  A comma Nazi.  A speaker of some obscure dialect.

True, about a thousand of those insertions and deletions have to do with my shaky grasp of commas, ellipses, the overuse of italics, my tendency to write really long paragraphs and so on.  I tear through those, mindlessly accepting every punctuation and formatting change and (reluctantly) attempting to learn something in the process.

I suppose there are writers out there somewhere who have a firm grasp on all the rules of grammar and punctuation, who can diagram a sentence like a superhero, who outline their novels in advance and perhaps even know what they did and how they did it.

Being more of a jump-of-a-cliff-and-write-myself-out-of-the-resulting-predicament sort of writer, for me editing involves facing up to a lot of not entirely thought out plot twists, inexplicable character motivations and odd dialogue fragments that have little to do with the story.  What was I thinking? becomes the question I ask myself most often.

This is when the real work starts.  On the second run through the edited file, I move on to the deeper issues, the ones that require concentrated thought, the kind of thought that makes my brain hurt and my feet spontaneously carry me to the fridge.  From simple word repetitions to point of view violations to awkward construction to floating body parts, passive voice, faulty simultaneous action, all kindly pointed out by my sharp-eyed editor- these issues force me to deconstruct sentences, question purpose, recreate rhythm, delete, delete, delete and work the hell out of my dictionary. 

This is a process that takes many hours over the course of several days. I become completely immersed in the world of the book, which I am now convinced sucks beyond any hope of redemption.  A friend commented that this process sounds tedious.  I mean, come one, 2,234 corrections?  Oddly enough, and by odd, I mean I must be a masochist, I’m never once bored during this process. This is my craft, my chosen boulder, my art.  Besides, I’m too damn scared to get bored.

For the deeper I go, the harder the challenges presented, the more the fear kicks in.  Fear that I won’t be able to do it. I won’t be able to fix it. It’s too broken.  I’ve reached the level of my competence and cannot go higher – not in the ten days I have to get that steaming pile of hideous pages back to the editor!  I lie awake at night full of dread, self-doubt and the crippling realization that I don’t have the slightest clue how to write a good novel.

But they bought it, right? So there must be something redeemable about it. Possibly even, something good.  

Sitting at the keyboard, taking the editing process one comment, one syntax error, one failed metaphor at a time, I know I can write. I know I can do this.  Working with an editor pushes me beyond my comfort zone, beyond what I can do by myself. It forces me to be better than I am.

When I finally hit send and collapse into a puddle of depleted goo, I know that miraculously I have done better than my yesterday best.  And with luck and determination, the next book will be better, even though I know it will never be my tomorrow best.

*I wrote this post a while back (okay, years back) and for some reason I have forgotten, never posted it. For honesty’s sake, I feel I should point out that I’m not currently toiling to get a book ready for a publisher because, sadly, the publisher in question folded. And yes, I am still in pursuit of tomorrow’s best.

Back to Basics – Motivation

by Cynthia Ray

All week I struggled with finding a suitable topic for this blog.  I wrote and discarded several, but this morning I woke up with a complete blog about motivation in my mind. Hooray! However, In the process of research, I found that I had already written on this exact topic back in 2017.  In fact, the blog had returned to me exactly as I had written it then. This led me to explore writing on the topic by fellow Shadowspinners.  Wow! There are some insightful writings here. So if you are interested in finding out more about motivation, getting past writers block, applying incentives, or just showing up at the keyboard, these blogs are for you.

Our Oldest Friends Know Our Youngest Hearts

A Note on Life, Death, and Characterization

by Eric Witchey

I’ve been a full-time freelance writer, teacher, and communication consultant for over three decades. I have trouble believing it, but the numbers don’t lie. Even after all the study and practice of those years, certain aspects of writing, especially fiction writing, remain a mystery. Chief among the mysteries is the concept of characterization. I’m not talking about the cognitive concept of character or about the many elements of crafting characters that can be listed and categorized. I’m not even talking about the deep psychology connected to character’s heart-driven agendas. I’m talking about the mystery of that tiny moment after drafts are finished and all the conscious work is done when the writer’s subconscious, the magical intersection of mind and heart, rises to the occasion of translating all of the above into a few perfect words that allow the illusion of humanity to form whole and believably in the mind/heart of the reader.

That mystery.

Last year, one of my best friends from high school died. Dave Lay got up, had breakfast, went to work, and dropped dead on the work site—a sudden and fatal heart attack. Everyone who knew him, and especially his family, will miss him and the joy he brought into so many hearts. Good peedinking to you, old friend.

During our teen years, Dave Lay and I spent endless summer hours peedinking, which to us meant aimlessly wandering fields, forests, and streams to see what we could see. We lifted rocks, flipped corrugated tin, rummaged through dumps, and dug in river muck just to see. From time to time, our rock and tin flipping took on a more serious focus. We hunted venomous snakes. That was never called peedinking. That was called snake hunting and was a focused, consciously practiced and skilled activity. In the photo, that’s Dave casually holding a pillowcase full of Timber Rattlesnakes and a few Copperheads at the Morris, PA. Rattlesnake Roundup.

After my own heart attack and subsequent quadruple bypass surgery in January of this year, I found myself dancing around a little survivor’s guilt over Dave’s death. He was so deeply loved by so many, and he was taken away young and strong and without warning. On the other hand, I told myself in my more maudlin moments, I would leave exactly the same gap in people’s lives as a finger being pulled out of a glass of water.

Then, family and old friends from my hometown sent me cards, letters, text messages, and notes on social media. I was surprised by how many and by some of the more unexpected ones. Notes came from old flames, from old friends, and from a few people I barely remember who had, over the years, found some of my stories and received joy from them.

Now, don’t get me wrong on this. I got a lot of outpouring of support and love from many friends I’ve made over the years. People I knew when I sold waterbeds and furniture reached out. People from college touched base. Folks I knew from full-time tech jobs in the late 80s wished me well. Friends made in the dozens of companies and government organizations I consulted for sent cards. Students and fellow fiction writers sent notes and cards and even financial support for delivered meals to get me through the period of time when I couldn’t feed myself. I could keep going, but the point here is that I was forced to accept that I have had an impact on the lives of others. The very worst I can justify for my maudlin moments is that my impact has been odd and sometimes twisted. Luckily, and with thanks to all these people, I do better than that most of the time.

Which takes me back to Dave Lay. Maybe I can’t justify my feelings of guilt that I’m alive when he is not, but that doesn’t mean I should feel the loss of my old friend any less. He was a very important part of my formation as a human being. He was family, and the last experience we shared, though we were far apart when we experienced it, was the chill of disorientation and sudden constriction in the chest.

As the spring wore on and I put hours and hours into peedinking as part of my outdoor cardiac therapy, all the above experiences collided in memory and heart to create a maelstrom of thought and feeling from which ideas were occasionally ejected whole into my consciousness. Somewhere in that mess, the mystery of characterization ran into the memories of aimless peedinking and the focus of hunting copperheads to become an insight into characterization.

I have rarely, in fact with a couple exceptions never, based my characters on actual individuals I have known. However, I suspect that all my characters are born from my own subjective experiences of all the people I have known. The conscious work with all the fiddly bits of character development to create an imaginary person who not only fits into a story but must be the manifestation of the story because their personal history, their ideologies, and their attitudes and aspirations are precisely what is needed to let the reader believe in the tale only sets parameters for the subconscious to mine my memories of my relationships with thousands of people.

The magical, mystical translation of experienced memory into just the right words at the right moment for the reader to believe in the reality of the character for a little while comes from all the people I have known—all of them at once. The best, most complete and emotionally powerful attributes come from the people I knew when I was youngest. Our oldest friends know our youngest hearts is true in life. In fiction, the truth is that the best hearts of our characters come from our oldest friends.

I have never, and will never, be able to create a character who captures the essence of family, music, and wonder that lived in Dave Lay’s heart. I’ll never capture the wisdom and kindness of Fr. David Foxen, Ph.D., a man who selflessly cared for a damaged young man who needed help. I’ll never encapsulate the love of children that drove Sister Francis Xavier into fits of rage born of her need to keep us safe from the world. I’ll never capture the cruelties, betrayals, and dangerous camaraderie of children playing unsupervised in barns, woods, and fields or of back-alley tribes of paperboys waiting for presses to finish a run so they could head out to their routes.

And on and on and on…

However, all those people, their words, their behavior, the truths, the lies, the wisdom, and the foolishness, were imprinted on a young heart and mind. They became, if not actual then much like, Jungian archetypes. Especially the innocent beliefs and awkward hypocrisies of our behavior as children learning to become adults became deeply impressed foundations for capturing and mixing together all the nuances of sociology and psychology of character that would come later.

The subconscious has no choice but to work with fragments of memory to build patterns of meaning around whatever scaffold of criteria we create. No character, no matter who purely we think it might match some individual from our lives, is ever built of one set of memories. Rather, character is what we remember of thousands of people, and all characters are built on the archetypal foundations of those purest hearts we knew so well when we were young.

-End-